I got hooked into utilizing Exceptional long ago and Certainly..it continues to be fairly of the filthy burning powder howbit a lot less than Exceptional use to generally be…God it was a dirty burning powder but it absolutely was and nonetheless is a very utility powder and a really good General powder.
Add to quotation Only exhibit this user #5 · Could sixteen, 2016 (Edited) 1) Choose four manuals and you'll find four distinct max demand weights. In most cases, you will discover that, when they demonstrate pressures, that every one the max pressures are in the 33-35KSI selection and so are NOT diminished for law firm good reasons but due to the fact powder may differ by large amount, unique bullets are made use of, distinctive COLs are made use of and distinctive guns are made use of.
If I could get my palms on some CFE I'd personally like to check out it on 9mm. CFE worked quite very well for my forty five ACP and 38 Particular hundreds (fired by way of a GP100).
It is really rather multipurpose for absolutely anything. It is identical powder as Winchester 231, just various title. Meters effectively, burns thoroughly clean and is regarding the exact burn off amount as Alliant's Exceptional. Been working with it for numerous years without having challenges.
Also, given that I Solid and shoot almost only Forged, I used to be pondering attempting Solo1k to get far from several of the smoke I get with BE. Any person know the way warm HP38 burns? As well as smoke final results I ought to anticipate when loading HP38 with cast bullets?
I use a Hornady Lock & Load (digital) bench scale and a Lee beam scale. I have discovered both of those scales to be exact and reputable to inside of one/10 of the grain as advertised. In distinction both equally powder steps rely on the HP38 powde type and coarseness of the powder applied for their precision.
I been making use of that previous Speer / RCBS guide for a long time—almost certainly far too extended. I’ve obtained other manuals in addition that cover the span of time considering that then. The large factor that’s modified is all The brand new powders that We now have, and For lots of of these, all we have is the web.
For most applications mid variety powders perform ideal while in the 9MM but whenever you shoot competitively as an alternative to worrying in regards to the following Zombie attack you'll find aspects to issue you:
Posted September 11, 2009 If I'm looking through your submit right, you say hp38 is comparable to bullseye??? that being claimed, The explanation why its notthat well-liked could well be (to me) an increased or sharp recoil impulse versus other powders in existence, for that forty I am working with WST which can be hp-38 powder softer emotion recoilwise by a mile, for your 9mm slight I'm utilizing VV 3n37 and w/ the 147 grain its additional of the drive than sharp recoil
If I'm looking through your submit appropriate, you say hp38 is comparable to bullseye??? that remaining said, The main reason why its notthat common could well be (to me) an elevated or sharp recoil impulse rather than other powders on the market, to the 40 I'm using WST which is softer feeling recoilwise by a mile, with the 9mm insignificant I'm making use of VV 3n37 and w/ the 147 grain its a lot more of a push than sharp recoil
as you get through the ADI chart, and at least know that the data was not likely to make novice loaders believe that cost weights might be "equivalent".
What I could do is once the CFE powder arrives is market my 4LB of Titegroup and 3LB of HP-38 and use that cash towards much more primers and bullets.
Increase to quote Only exhibit this user #22 · Apr 22, 2023 Powder makers (DuPont/IMR, Olin/Winchester, Hercules/Alliant) and distributors experienced put out warning notices whenever they launch a new lots of a specific powder that's hotter/more rapidly/slower than earlier tons and knowledge.
There's little powder created state aspect and the 2 powder crops are owned through the US Military and leased out to manufactures.